Agentic Engagement Siswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v16i2.234Keywords:
keterlibatan, keterlibatan agen, tinjauan literatur sistematik, tinjauan, siswaAbstract
Engagement is the effort that students make by directly contributing to achieving the goal of learning success. Student engagement is considered a predictor of improved learning performance, academic achievement and socializing quality of learners. Research on engagement in educational contexts has grown in recent years. The concept of engagement that is often used in recent research is student engagement with three aspects, namely, behavior, emotional, and cognitive engagement. Then there are studies that suggest that the theory of engagement so far only sees student behavior as a passive recipient of information from the teacher. Therefore, the concept of engagement is developed by adding one construct, namely, agentic engagement. This construct explains engagement as proactive behavior that arises from students' initiatives that are constructive for the learning environment. This article aims to review: (a) the concept of agentic engagement in current research and (b) factors that influence agentic engagement in the learning context. The method used is a systematic literature review. The results of this review indicate that the construct of agentic engagement is a recent component of student engagement. The conclusions of this systematic literature review are, (a) agentic engagement is an important predictor of learning success, (b) agentic engagement can be influenced by internal and external factors, and (c) the role of teachers in providing autonomy support to students is important to encourage students' motivation to be agentically engaged in learning. The findings of this systematic literature review can be followed up by teachers, schools and parents to design lessons that support students' agentic engagement.
References
Bergin, J. & McWilliams, K. (2023). Supporting Student Self-Regulation: Designing and Deploying Effective Microsurveys and Warning Systems to Help Learners Help Themselves. In D. Glick, J. Bergin, & C. Chang (Eds.), Supporting Self-Regulated Learning and Student Success in Online Courses (pp. 122-142). IGI Global. Https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6500-4.ch006.
Jang, Hye-Ryen. (2023). Extending Self-Determination Theory’s Dual-Process Model to s New Tripartite Model to Explain Diminished Functioning. Motivation and Emotion. 1-20. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10019-0.
Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2019). A Study Of The Relationship Between Students’ Engagement and Their Academic Performances in an (Elearning) Environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1–20. Https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019882567.
Zendarski, Nardia & Guo, Shuaijun & Sciberras, Emma & Efron, Daryl & Quach, Jon & Winter, Leanne & Bisset, Matthew & Middeldorp, Christel & Coghill, David. (2020). Examining the Educational Gap for Children with ADHD and Subthreshold ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. 26. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720972790.
Truta, Camelia & PARV, Luminita & Topala, Ioana. (2018). Academic Engagement and Intention to Drop Out: Levers for Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability. 10, 4637. Https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124637.
Yang, Dong & Chen, Peng & Wang, Kai & Li, Zhuoran & Zhang, Chen & Huang, Ronghuai. (2023). Parental Involvement and Student Engagement: a Review of the Literature. Sustainability. Https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075859.
Raphael Owusu, Ebenezer Bonyah & Yarhands Dissou Arthur (2023) The Effect of GeoGebra on University Students’ Understanding of Polar Coordinates, Cogent Education, 10:1, Https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2177050.
Maralani, M. F., Shalbaf, A., & Gholamali Lavasani, M. (2018). Agentic Engagement and Test Anxiety: The Mediatory Role of the Basic Psychological Needs. SAGE Open, 8(2), 215824401877288. Https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401877288.
OZUDOGRU, Melike. (2021). The Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Learning Approaches and Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Environment According to RASE Model. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education. 10. 358-377. Https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.797154.
Bordbar M. (2021). Autonomy-Supportive Faculty, Students’ Self-System Processes, Positive Academic Emotions, and Agentic Engagement: Adding Emotions to Self-System Model of Motivational Development. Front. Psychol. 12:727794. doi: Https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727794.
Gomes, S., Costa, L., Martinho, C. et al. Modeling Students’ Behavioral Engagement Through Different in-Class Behavior Styles. IJ STEM Ed 10, 21 (2023). Https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00407-w.
Chen, Chumei & Shen, Yuanyi & Zhu, Yujie & Xiao, Fanghao & Zhang, Jiawen & Ni, Jianchao. (2023). The Effect of Academic Adaptability on Learning Burnout Among College Students: The Mediating Effect of Self-Esteem and the Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. Volume 16. 1615-1629. Https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S408591.
Söderholm, Fiia & Viljaranta, Jaana & Tuominen, Heta & Lappalainen, Kristiina & Holopainen, Leena. (2023). Student Engagement Profiles and the Role Of Support in General Upper Secondary Education. Learning and Individual Differences. 104. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102289.
Benneker, I.M.B., Lee, N.C. & van Atteveldt, N. Mindset And Perceived Parental Support of Autonomy Safeguard Adolescents’ Autonomous Motivation During COVID-19 Home-Based Learning. npj Sci. Learn. 8, 4 (2023). Https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00153-2.
Zambrano, J., Kennedy, A. A. U., Aguilera, C., Yates, N., & Patall, E. A. (2022). Students’ Beliefs About Agentic Engagement: A Phenomenological Study in Urban High School Physical Science and Engineering Classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 1028–1047. Https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000690.
Benlahcene, A., Awang-Hashim, R., Kaur, A., & Wan-Din, W. Z. (2022). Perceived Autonomy Support and Agentic Engagement Among Malaysian Undergraduates: the Mediatory Role of Personal Best Goals. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(1), 33–45. Https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1879743.
Pineda-Báez, C., Hennig Manzuoli, C., & Vargas Sánchez, A. (2019). Supporting student cognitive and agentic engagement: Students’ voices. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 81–90. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.005.
Reeve, J., Jang, H. R., Shin, S. H., Ahn, J. S., Matos, L., & Gargurevich, R. (2022). When students show some initiative: Two experiments on the benefits of greater agentic engagement. Learning and Instruction, 80. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101564.
Matos, L., Reeve, J., Herrera, D., & Claux, M. (2018). Students’ Agentic Engagement Predicts Longitudinal Increases in Perceived Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 592–609. Https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1448746.
Jiang AL and Zhang LJ (2021) University Teachers’ Teaching Style and Their Students’ Agentic Engagement in EFL Learning in China: A Self-Determination Theory and Achievement Goal Theory Integrated Perspective. Front. Psychol. 12:704269. Https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704269.
Patall, E. A., Kennedy, A. A. U., Yates, N., Zambrano, J., Lee, D., & Vite, A. (2022). The Relations Between Urban High School Science Students’ Agentic Mindset, Agentic Engagement, and Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Control. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 71, 102097. Https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102097
Cohen, R., Moed, A., Shoshani, A., Roth, G., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2020). Teachers’ Conditional Regard and Students’ Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(4), 790–803. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y.
Psyche 165 Journal has launched a new template since Vol. 18, No. 2 (2025)
