Analyzing Oxford Happiness Questionnaire Indonesian Version Using the Generalized Partial Credit Model

Kenzo; Ananta Yudiarso; Marcellino Alvin  Nugroho; John Sebastian  Mustika

doi:10.35134/jpsy165.v17i2.353

Authors

Kenzo University of Surabaya
Ananta Yudiarso University of Surabaya
Marcellino Alvin Nugroho University of Surabaya
John Sebastian Mustika University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v17i2.353

Keywords:

happiness, Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), validation, GPCM, Indonesian version

Abstract

Happiness is an essential aspect of psychological well-being, and measuring it accurately is crucial for policymakers and researchers. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ) is a widely used tool to assess happiness, but its validity and reliability in different cultural contexts, such as Indonesia, are yet to be determined. This research aimed to analyze the item responses of the Indonesian version of the OHQ using the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM). Participants were Indonesian citizens aged between 18-40 years old, and the data were collected through an online survey. The GPCM analysis revealed that three items in the Indonesian version of the OHQ have low discriminant value. This may be due to unclear statements or insufficient information to accurately measure happiness. Despite this, the overall conclusion is that the Indonesian version of the OHQ is suitable for use as a test tool to measure overall happiness perceived by people in Indonesia. This information can be valuable for policymakers and researchers to better understand happiness levels in the country and develop strategies to improve overall well-being. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the OHQ, contributing to ongoing efforts to measure happiness in diverse cultural contexts. The findings can be used to inform future research and policy decisions aimed at promoting happiness and psychological well-being in Indonesian.

Author Biographies

Kenzo, University of Surabaya

Department of Psychology

Ananta Yudiarso, University of Surabaya

Department of Psychology

Marcellino Alvin Nugroho, University of Surabaya

Department of Psychology

John Sebastian Mustika, University of Surabaya

Department of Psychology

References

Ruggeri, K., García-Garzón, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-Being is More Than Happiness and Life Satisfaction: a Multidimensional Analysis of 21 Countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1). Https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y.

Olena, C. (2020). The Relationship Between Quality of Life and Happiness. Happiness and Contemporary Society : Conference Proceedings Volume (Lviv, March, 20-21, 2020), p. 60-62. Https://doi.org/10.31108/7.2020.13.

Murgaš, F., Petrovič, F., Maturkanič, P., & Králik, R. (2022). Happiness or Quality of Life? or Both? Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 13(1), 17-36. Https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.17.36.

Yıldırım, M. (2021). Irrational Happiness Beliefs and Subjective Well-Being of Undergraduate Students: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 65–72. Https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.258.

Ilhan, A., & Otman, N. (2020). Analysis of Psychological Well-Being and Happiness Levels of University Students who do Swimming and Fitness. African Educational Research Journal, 8, 273-278. Https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.8S2.20.056.

Novianti, L. E., Wungu, E., & Purba, F. D. (2020). Quality of Life as A Predictor of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. Jurnal Psikologi, vol. 47(2). 93-103. Https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.47634.

Purba, F. D., & Fitriana, T. S. (2019). Sociodemographics Determinant of Self-reporting Mental Health Problems in Indonesian Urban Population. UI Scholars Hub. Https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.46.

Ng, Y-K. (2022). What is Happiness? Why is Happiness Important?. Happiness-Concept, Measurement, and Promotion. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4972-8_1.

Jamal, M. T. (2023). Achieving Authentic Happiness According to Positive Psychology Martin Seligman and Wahdat al-Syuhud Muhammad Nafis al-Banjari. Syifa al-Qulub: Jurnal Studi Psikoterapi Sufistik 7, 2 (2023): 35-51. Https://doi.org/10.15575/saq.

Jahagirdar, D. (2020). Psychology of Happiness: an Innovative Approach. International Journal of Indian Psychology. Https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.055.

Besser, L. L. (2020). The Philosophy of Happiness: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Routledge. Https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315283692-8.

Blanchflower, D. G. (2020). Is Happiness U-Shaped Everywhere? Age and Subjective Well-Beng in 145 Countries. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 575-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00797-z.

Petrovič, F., & Murgaš, F. (2020). Linking Sustainability and Happiness. What kind of Happiness?. GeoScape, 14(1), 70–79. Https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2020-0007.

International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de psicología. (n.d.). Https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.

Xiong, X. (2020). Critical Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 670. Https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220704.172.

Rana, J., Gutierrez, P.L., & Oldroyd, J. (2021). Quantitative Methods. in Springer eBooks (pp. 1-6). Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_460-1.

Rahmawati, E., Saragih, J. I., Adeline, N. (2017). Psychometric Properties of Indonesian Version of The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire. Advances in Health Sciences Research, Vol 1. Https://doi.org/0.2991/phico-16.2017.33.

Sırgancı, G., & Uyumaz, G. (2022). Determining the Factors Affecting the Psychological Distance Between Categories in the Rating Scale. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(3), 178–190. Https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.858599.

Wind, S. A. (2023). Detecting Rating Scale Malfunctioning With the Partial Credit Model and Generalized Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(5), 953-983. Https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221116292.

Gyamfi, A., & Acquaye, R. (2023). Parameters and Models of Items Response Theory (IRT) : A Review of Literature. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(3), 68-78. Https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0022.