Intensi Perilaku Kerja Inovatif pada Teleworker: Pengaruh Knowledge Sharing dan Psychological Safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v17i3.399Keywords:
intensi perilaku kerja inovatif, teleworker, knowledge sharing, psychological safety, vignetteAbstract
Dunia pasca-pandemi telah mendorong peralihan ke penetapan sistem kerja jarak jauh atau teleworking sebagai pengaturan kerja permanen bagi sebagian besar perusahaan dan organisasi. Namun, persebaran fisik dari rekan kerja dan adanya ketergantungan pada teknologi pada sistem teleworking menimbulkan penurunan perilaku kerja inovatif karyawan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh bentuk knowledge sharing, yaitu tacit dan explicit, dan tingkat psychological safety, terhadap intensi perilaku kerja inovatif pada teleworker atau pekerja jarak jauh. Penelitian ini menggunakan experimental vignette method dengan desain penelitian 2x2 between-subject dan hasil diuji menggunakan analisis two-way ANOVA. 248 partisipan penelitian didapatkan melalui teknik convenience sampling dengan kriteria pekerja jarak jauh atau teleworker di perusahaan marketplace/e-commerce di Indonesia dengan masa kerja minimal 1 tahun. Setiap partisipan menerima secara acak satu vignette dalam bentuk narasi skenario yang merupakan kombinasi variasi kedua variabel bebas sebagai stimulus manipulasi, sehingga partisipan terbagi menjadi 4 kelompok berdasarkan vignette yang diterima. Partisipan kemudian mengisi kuesioner Skala Perilaku Kerja Inovatif yang telah dimodifikasi menjadi skala intensi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk knowledge sharing (F (1, 244) = 349.14, p = < .001) dan tingkat psychological safety (F (1, 244) = 512.4, p = < .001) memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap intensi perilaku kerja inovatif dan terdapat efek interaksi yang signifikan antara keduanya (F (1, 244) = 149.05, p = < .001). Teleworker yang melakukan tacit knowledge sharing di lingkungan kerja dengan psychological safety tinggi memiliki intensi perilaku kerja inovatif yang lebih besar.
References
Athanasiadou, C., & Theriou, G. (2021). Telework: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Heliyon, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08165
Wirapratama, J. D., & Dahesihsari, R. (2022). Gambaran Kesiapan Karyawan untuk Kembali Bekerja di Kantor: Perubahan dari WFH ke WFO. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi MIND SET, 13(02), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.35814/mindset.v13i02.3773
Aprilina, R., & Martdianty, F. (2023). The Role of Hybrid-Working in Improving Employees' Satisfaction, Perceived Productivity, and Organizations' Capabilities. Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan, 16(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v16i2.45632
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from Home: Characteristics and Outcomes of Telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
Dash, B. (2022). Remote Work and Innovation During This Covid-19 Pandemic: an Employers’ Challenge. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 14(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2022.14202
Viardot, E., Brem. A., & Nylund., P. A. (2023). Post-Pandemic Implications for Crisis Innovation: A Technological Innovation View. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122680
Ham, P. M., & Etikariena, A. (2022). Innovative Employees in Dealing with COVID-19: What Are the Roles of Flexible Work Arrangements, Workloads, and Work Engagement?. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 9(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu204
Anwar, R., Rehman, M., Wang, K. S., Hashmani, M. A., & Shamim, A. (2019). Investigation of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Global Software Development Organizations Using Social Cognitive Theory. IEEE Access, 7, 71286–71298. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912657
Rezaei, M., Ferraris, A., Busso, D., & Rizzato, F. (2022). Seeking Traces of Democracy in the Workplace: Effects on Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(10), 2528–2557. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2021-0103
Rahmahthia, S. E., & Etikariena, A. (2019). Pengaruh Knowledge Sharing Behavior terhadap Perilaku Inovatif di Tempat Kerja pada Karyawan PT X dan PT Y. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 7(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.24854/JPS.V7I2.1126
Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge Sharing and Innovation: A Systematic Review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
Farnese, M. L., Barbieri, B., Chirumbolo, A., & Patriotta, G. (2019). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: A Nonaka's SECI Model Operationalization. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02730
Gamble, J. R. (2020). Tacit Vs Explicit Knowledge as Antecedents for Organizational Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(6), 1123 -1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2020-0121
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the Role of Social Capital, Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Quality and Reciprocity in Determining Innovation Capability of an Organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190
Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
Andersson, M., Moen, O., & Brett, P. O. (2020). The Organizational Climate for Psychological Safety: Associations with Smes’ Innovation Capabilities and Innovation Performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101554
Xu, Z., Wang, H., & Suntrayuth, S. (2022). Organizational Climate, Innovation Orientation, and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety and Intrinsic Motivation. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 9067136. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9067136
Zhu, J., Lv, H., & Feng, Y. (2022). The Effect of Psychological Safety on Innovation Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022), 3082–3087. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.503
Eifler, S., & Petzold, K. (2019). Validity Aspects of Vignette Experiments: Expected “What‐If” Differences Between Reports of Behavioral Intentions and Actual Behavior. Experimental Methods in Survey Research, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083771
Baguley, T., Dunham, G., & Steer, O. (2022). Statistical Modelling of Vignette Data in Psychology. British journal of psychology, 113(4), 1143–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12577
Muise, D., & Pan, J. (2019). Online Field Experiments. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1453850
Su, W., Lin, X., & Ding, H. (2019). The Influence of Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employee Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01581
Coleman, R. (2019). Designing Experiments for the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878958
Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2021). Violating the Normality Assumption May Be the Lesser of Two Evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2576–2590. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5
Kucharska, W., & Erickson, S. (2023). Tacit Knowledge Acquisition & Sharing, and Its Influence on Innovations: A Polish/US Cross-Country Study. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102647
Baskoro, B. D., Sinambela, E. A., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2021). Hubungan Kecerdasan Emosional, Tacit Knowledge Sharing, dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif pada Pekerja Konstruksi di Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 20(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2021.20.2.5
Psyche 165 Journal has launched a new template since Vol. 18, No. 2 (2025)
