The Role of TAM as a Mediator between Organizational Support and Technostress of ASN Employees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v18i3.596Keywords:
technostress, perceived organizational support, technology acceptanceAbstract
The SIKAP IDAMAN application as a digital innovation in civil service management, providing access to daily performance reports (LKH), performance data, and employee discipline mapping. However, its implementation has presented psychological challenges, particularly technostress among employees. This study aims to explore the influence of perceived organizational support and technology acceptance on technostress among civil servants in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency Government. A quantitative approach was employed, involving 36 employees from the Inspectorate Office who actively use the SIKAP IDAMAN application. Mediation analysis was conducted using JASP software version 0.14.1.0 to examine the relationships between variables. The results show that perceived organizational support significantly influences technostress through technology acceptance (p = 0.036). Perceived organizational support also has a direct negative effect on technostress (p = 0.000) with a path coefficient of -0.281 (low category, f² = 0.111). Furthermore, organizational support significantly influences technology acceptance (p = 0.000) with a path coefficient of 0.849 (high category, f² = 2.584). Technology acceptance also negatively affects technostress (p = 0.031) with a path coefficient of -0.448 (moderate category, f² = 0.154). These findings highlight the importance of technology acceptance as a mediating factor in reducing technostress, and emphasize the critical role of organizational support in facilitating successful technology adaptation among civil servants.
Keywords: technostress, perceived organizational support, technology acceptance
References
Irawan, B. (2017). Studi analisis konsep E-Government: Sebuah paradigma baru dalam pelayanan publik. Journal Paradigma, 2(1), 174–201. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jp.v2i1.351
Payong, Y. (2019). Kesiapan implementasi e-government menuju penguatan sistem inovasi daerah (SIDa) Kota Kupang. Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37182/jik.v4i1.27
Diskomifo Kutai Kartanegara. (2021). Masterplan smart city Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara.
Utama, A. A. G. S. (2020). The implementation of e-government in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(7), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i7.929
KukarPaper.com. (2022). Aplikasi SIKAP idaman resmi diluncurkan. PemKab Kutai Kartanegara, Diakses pada tanggal 12 Mei 2024.
Abbas, A., Saud, M., Ekowati, D., Usmand, I., & Setia, I. (2020). Technology and stress: a proposed framework for coping with stress in Indonesian higher education. International Journal of Innovation Creativity and Change, 13(4), 373–390.
Torre, G. La, Leonardis, V. De, & Chiappetta, M. (2020). Technostress: how does it affect the productivity and life of an individual? Results of an observational study. Public Health, 189, 60–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.013.
Wang, X., Tan, S. C., & Li, L. (2020). Measuring university students’ technostress in technology-enhanced learning: Scale development and validation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 96–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5329.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Wicaksono, S. R. (2022). Toeri dasar technology acceptance model. Seribu Bintang.
Sugiyono (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109.
Mulyanto, A., Sumarsono, Niyartama, T. F., & Syaka, A. K. (2020). Penerapan technology acceptance model (TAM) dalam pengujian model penerimaan aplikasi MasjidLink. Semesta Teknika, 23(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.18196/st.231253.
Haryono, S. (2016). Metode SEM untuk penelitian manajeman dengan AMOS LISREL PLS. PT. Intermedia Personalia Utama.
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.
Wulansari, N. A., Ranihusna, D., & Witiatuti, R. S. (2015). Reduction effect of technostress with role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(7), 5159–5171.
Salzmann-Erikson, M., Olsson, A., Rezagholi, M., Fjellström, D., & Osarenkhoe, A. (2024). Bridging technostress and continuous learning in knowledge-intensive organizations: A socio-technical systems approach for the future of healthy working life. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(13), 8938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8938.
Solís, P., Lago-Urbano, R., & Real Castelao, S. (2023). Factors that impact the relationship between perceived organizational support and technostress in teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), 364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050364.
Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Su, C., Zhang, X., Sun, L., & Yuan, X. (2024). Technostress and employee safety performance in China: The moderating role of perceived organizational support and the mediating role of job burnout. Journal of General Management, 0(0). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070241297228.
Yang, D., Liu, J., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, C., & Metwally, A. H. S. (2025). Technostress among teachers: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 168, 108619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108619.
Andreou, S. (2019). Mitigating technostress in new knowledge workers through perceived self-efficacy. Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.
Shamsi, M., Iakovleva, T., Olsen, E., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2021). Employees’ work-related well-being during COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated perspective of technology acceptance model and JD-R theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11888. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211888.
Li, L., Kanchanapoom, K., Deeprasert, J., Duan, N., & Qi, Z. (2025). Unveiling the factors shaping teacher job performance: exploring the interplay of personality traits, perceived organizational support, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02324-1.
Hoi, S., Yu, Y., & Ye, L. (2023). How perceived organizational support influences university students’ intention to use AI language models in course learning: An exploratory study based on the technology acceptance model. ICIEA ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence, 781--786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3660043.3660182.
Esen, M., & Özbağ, G. K. (2014). An investigation of the effects of organizational readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM applications. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(1), 232. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i1.5643.
Rahmadani, R., Rahim, A. R., Prasilowati, S. L., & Siradjuddin, S. (2024). A literature review on the effect of perceived organizational support on employee engagement and employee performance of government agencies in Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i01.663.
Yoon, S.-Y., & Chun, Y. (2023). A study on satisfaction and continuous use intention of OTT platform digital content provision service - based on value based acceptance model. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(2), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0233.
Yin, Z., Yan, J., Fang, S., Wang, D., & Han, D. (2022). User acceptance of wearable intelligent medical devices through a modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10(11), 629. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831390.
Sari, A. S., Pujangkoro, S. A., & Sembiring, B. K. F. (2022). Analysis of the effect of social media and experiential marketing on consumer purchase decisions of rainbow rice medan. International Journal of Educational Review, Law and Social Sciences, 2(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v2i2.224.
Jati, A., Jupit, R., Aini, N., Zamlan, A. I., & Nordin, A. I. (2024). Evaluating the sabah pay mobile application (e-wallet) using the technology acceptance model. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 53(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.53.1.86101.
Ho, K.-F., Chang, P., Kurniasari, M. D., Susanty, S., & Chung, M. (2020). Determining factors affecting nurses’ acceptance of a care plan system using a modified technology acceptance model 3: Structural equation model with cross-sectional data. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(5), e15686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/15686.
Choi, Y. (2024). The moderating effect of leader-member exchange on the relationship between technostress and organizational commitment. Management Research Review, 47(6), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2023-0138









