Perbedaan Adversity Quotient ditinjau dari Coping Stress dan Self Efficacy

Authors

  • Diny Atrizka Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Kevin Sanjaya Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Dea Vanthera Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Wulandari Wulandari Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Khrisna Sanubari Limbong Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Rizky Yusfasari Universitas Prima Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v13i2.89

Keywords:

adversity quotient, coping stress, self efficacy

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the difference adversity quotient in terms of coping stress and self-efficacy of tenth grade students in SMA Swasta Medan. The population of this study was all of the students of tenth grade in SMA Swasta Medan. The subjects used in this study were 146 students who were selected using the disproportionate stratified random sampling method. This study was a comparative quantitative, data collected used Likert Scale which is adversity quotient (AQ), coping stress (CS), and self-efficacy (SE) scale. In this study the data analysis technique used is analysis of varians (ANOVA). The assumptions test consisted of an normality test, a homogenity test, and a hypothesis test.The result of data analysis showed a significant difference adversity quotient in terms of coping stress with Sig .000 < p = .05 and a significant difference adversity quotient in terms of self-efficacy with Sig .000 < p = .05 that owned by the students. The conclusion obtained from this study is a proven hypothesis, namely the difference between adversity quotient (AQ) in terms of coping stress (CS) and adversity quotient (AQ) in terms of self-efficacy (SE), where the contribution percentage of coping stress (CS) in influencing adversity quotient (AQ) was 16.6% and self-efficacy (SE) in influencing adversity quotient (AQ) was 19.5%, the rest was developed by other factors that were not appropriate by the researcher.

References

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Diakses pada November 8, 2018. Tersedia di: https://kbbi.web.id/. Widarnandana, I. G. D., & Simarmata, N. (2015). Pengaruh outbond terhadap efikasi diri pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 2 (2), pp.151-162.

Yusuf, S. (2001). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak & Remaja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

P, A. T. D., & Desiningrum, D. R. (2018). Hubungan secure attachment dengan ibu dan kecenderungan berperilaku agresi pada siswa SMA N 2 Ungaran. Jurnal Empati, 7 (3), pp.80-89. Cisilia Agustina S, 2016. Duh, Siswa Ketahuan Bawa HP Saat UN Di Taruh Di Paha [Online] (Update 05 April 2016) Tersedia di : https//bali.tribunnews.com/2016/04/05/duh-siswa-ketahuan-bawa-hp-saat-ditaruhdi-antara-paha. [Acessed 08 November 2018].

Stoltz, P. (2000). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: PT.Grasindo. Maryam, S. (2017). Strategi coping: Teori dan sumberdaya. Jurnal Konseling. Andi Mattapa, 1 (2), pp.101-107. doi = http://dx.doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v1i2.12.

Davison, G. C., Neale, J. M., & Kring, A. M. (2006). Psikologi Abnormal. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada Rahmi, S., Nadia, R., Hasibah, B., & Hidayat, W. (2017). The relation between self efficacy toward math with the math communication competence. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6 (2), pp.177-182. doi = https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p177-182.

Ghufron, M. N., & Risnawita, R. (2018). Teori-teori Psikologi. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Kurniasari, R., Dariyo, A., & Idulfilastri, R. M. (2018). Hubungan antara self efficacy dengan pengambilan keputusan karier pada mahasiswa tingkat akhir fakultas Psikologi (Studi kasus pada Universitas di Jakarta Barat). Journal An-nafs, 3 (1), pp.1-19. doi = https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v3i1.497.

Pranandari, K. (2008). Kecerdasan adversitas ditinjau dari pengatasan masalah berbasis permasalahan dan emosi pada orang tua tunggal wanita. Jurnal Psikologi, 1 (2), pp.121-128.

Saidah, S., & Aulia, A. A. (2014). Hubungan self efficacy dengan adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Psikologi, 2 (2), pp.54-61.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Hanbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Hamdi, A. S., & Bahruddin, E. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Aplikasi Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utama.

Martono, N. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Analisis Isi dan Analisis Data Sekunder. Jakarta: PT.Rajagrafindo Persada.

Priyanto, D. (2011). Buku Saku SPSS Analisis Statistic Data Lebih Cepat, Efisien, dan Akurat. Yogyakarta: Media Kom.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wibowo, M. W. (2015). Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi, adversity quotient, dan efikasi diri pada siswa kelas XII Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Magelang. Jurnal Psikologi Tabularasa, 10 (2), pp.186-200. Luszczynska, A., Guitierrez-Dona, B., Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40 (2), pp.80-89. doi = https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000041.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-06

How to Cite

Atrizka, D. ., Sanjaya, K. ., Vanthera, D. ., Wulandari, W., Limbong, K. S. ., & Yusfasari, R. . . (2020). Perbedaan Adversity Quotient ditinjau dari Coping Stress dan Self Efficacy . Psyche 165 Journal, 13(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v13i2.89

Issue

Vol. 13 (2020) No. 2

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Psyche 165 Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.